This bit of bondage buttfucking comes to us from a French sex comic by the name of La Captive, drawn by an artist identified only as Chris:
Click to see the tied-up anal sexing panel in a much larger size!
Elsewhere on Bondage Blog:
Look, Bondage Blog is very one-sided. Our motto is “taking pleasure in the beauty of restrained women” and 99% of all posts are about M/f, male-dominant, female-submissive BDSM of one kind or another. The reason? Because that’s what I like. (And you don’t run a blog for as many years as this without trailing off into nothingness and oblivion if you don’t like your subject matter.)
But one trend in BDSM “thinking” that I try to avoid promoting is the school of thought that John Norman and his Goreans took to the extreme — that idea that women are “naturally” submissive and men are “naturally” dominant. As near as I can tell, it’s highly individual to the person, and I don’t have any population data. Do there seem to be more dominant men and submissive women in the populations I’m familiar with? Yeah, but my info is a collection of anecdotes, there’s selection bias issues out the ass, and even if the raw numbers could be proved out that way, it still wouldn’t tell us anything about human nature because of the compounding (and in this case, surely overwhelming) variables of culture.
So you’ll see lots of “Here’s so and so, she’s pretty in chains” from me, but not so much of the “I am Man, thus I am Master, hear my dick roar” bullshit.
Why mention this now? Because I just stumbled over Calico’s blog (previous Bondage Blog posts featuring Calico are here, here, and here) and found her saying this on the subject:
So you may have noticed I play submissive to men. Lately I am trying to own it more.
But I don’t, in any way, think men are “more dominant” than women.
I believe that if we got over our cultural baggage, we would have as many dominant women as we have dominant men. I believe that women wouldn’t grow up quashing their inclinations as unfeminine and unattractive, molding their passions into “feminine” channels, feeling isolated and wrong, or assuming they must be butch, queer or even men. (Not that there is anything wrong with being those things, if you want to be.)
Mistress Matisse has an interesting, and I think spot-on, column in the The Stranger about why nerd culture and BDSM are such a comfortable overlapping fit:
Plenty of non-nerds like BDSM—in private. But they’re unwilling to make the cultural leap into a stigmatized social group. I’ve seen non-nerds who I knew were as kinky as Caligula walk into a BDSM party, look around, think “Oh no, these people are way too weird,” and leave. But when the grown-up nerd goes to his first BDSM social gathering, what does he see? People wearing unusual costumes, calling themselves made-up names and titles, having conversations rife with obscure jargon. Why, it’s just like a Star Trek convention! So the nerd takes it in stride. He and his friends have been called weird for years, so that doesn’t bother him. He understands that just because someone has a fetish you don’t share—be it feet or X-Men action figures—that doesn’t mean he couldn’t potentially be a friend or lover.
Having her hands tied behind her back isn’t slowing down this French comic book heroine at all:
Elsewhere on Bondage Blog:
Every now and then I come across a bondage photo I can only describe as inviting.
Doesn’t it make you feel… playful?
That’s Wenona, the parts of her you can see, and it’s from this Hogtied shoot.
Elsewhere on Bondage Blog:
Another Usenet find, artist unknown:
Elsewhere on Bondage Blog:
Here’s that rare find, some Dolcett art that hasn’t gone completely overboard into his snuffy stuff. It’s not that he didn’t do a lot of mainstream BDSM artwork, it’s just that his more extreme tastes seem to be what his fans have preserved, making stuff like this harder to find:
This comes from a comic sequence called Club X, and I found it on UseNet.
Elsewhere on Bondage Blog:
