Sometimes biologists and sociologists and people selling pickup-artist books will talk about the signs of female sexual receptivity. It’s a bit of a babble, but we bondage fans have it just a bit easier. We know what a sexually receptive woman looks like:
Lest there be any doubt, you can see the full extent of model Samantha Sin’s sexual receptivity in this gallery from Sex And Submission.
Here’s a shining example of voice-control bondage, from Slut On Display:
We didn’t talk much as we made our way back to the hotel and certainly no more when we got to our room.
“Put on the pair of burgundy panties you brought and get in the bath tub.”
“Good. Good slut. Now stay.”
When the door closed I didn’t understand it yet. When, after five or ten minutes, nobody opened it, I still didn’t.
When I peed all over myself, long after that, I understood. When everything had almost dried up again by the time He returned, including the panties, I didn’t even need to say it anymore.
“I knew you’d stay.”
I don’t know why they aren’t selling these at the Stockroom:
According to this page on archaic midwifery practices, it’s a Maunder’s Mouth Wedge, 1860s vintage, made of ebony. Apparently the thinking was “a woman’s mouth was to be kept open with a mouth wedge in order for her child in her womb to breath air while it was being removed by operation.”
Elsewhere on Bondage Blog:
Some very harsh vintage bondage art by Suzanne Ballivet:
Via Spank Slaves: The Blog. Quote:
For all that a good fire-and-brimstone sermon usually has to say about the torments of hell, the church version is usually pretty circumspect about the sexual side of things. But demons are imagined as both evil and sexual, so wouldn’t we expect to see more of this sort of thing in hell?
At first glance, you’d think from the look on Samantha Sin’s face that she’s worried about how long she can maintain this position:
Then you realize that the ropes are in charge. She’s not worried about how long she can maintain the position, she’s worried about how long the position will maintain her.
And then this second picture from the shoot just cries out for LOLcat-style captioning:
Pictures are from Hogtied, of course.
Elsewhere on Bondage Blog:
This is from the cover of Strange Terrors #1 (June 1952):
And the question I have is: why does the girl only have one leg?
I’m late to this party, but what the hell. The picture is from the BBC, no less:
Unfortunately, this cute couple got thrown off a bus for public leashing:
Dog-lead goths ‘hounded off bus’
A goth who leads his girlfriend around with a dog lead and collar was stopped from getting on a bus amid fears for passenger safety, a bus firm confirmed.
Dani Graves, 25, and his fiancee Tasha Maltby, 19, of Dewsbury, West Yorks, claim they have been discriminated against by bus firm Arriva Yorkshire.
The black-clad couple said they had been told to leave one bus and prevented from boarding another.
The bus firm said safety came first, but it was investigating the complaint.
Mr Graves told BBC Look North: “We’re used to strange looks, we’re used to comments.
“But we didn’t expect it from someone like that. They’re providing a public service. We had our bus passes, we did everything that you are supposed to do to get on a bus.”
Miss Maltby said she came up with the idea to wear a dog lead, and said previous boyfriends had called her a “weirdo” when she suggested it.
The couple said they “loved each other to pieces” and the use of the lead was a “sign of trust”.
Mr Graves said: “She’s very animal like, she’s kind of like a pet, as well as a partner.”
…
Bus operator Arriva claimed other passengers could be put at risk if the bus braked sharply.
…
“Our primary concern is passenger safety and while the couple are very welcome to travel on our buses, we are asking that Miss Maltby remove her dog lead before boarding the bus.
Elsewhere on Bondage Blog:
