I’ve always enjoyed “Le Brenn et sa part de butin” by Paul Jamin (1893):
But here’s the thing I don’t understand. Five slaves on the plunder pile. Only two are bound. How did he decide which of them were flight risks, and which were not?
Thanks to Erotic Mad Science for the posting a nice big version of this.
The Red-Headed Slut gives a present:
I have left a present for my boyfriend on my floor: a duct-taped girl with her panties pulled down, mascara smeared on her cheeks, and an array of sex toys and hurty things on the coffee table.
Of course, the girl is me. (In case you’re wondering, it is both easier and harder than you think to duct tape yourself like a victim.) Seven and I do a lot of consensual non-consent, specifically abuse/violence/rape play. I really wanted this particular scene to go further than we had n the past. I wanted to be used, violated, owned. In my head, I was a kidnap victim who is bound and gagged in a warehouse. I’d been told if I cooperated, they’d let me go once he was done with me. And he would be able to do anything he wanted. Anything.
The scene itself was inspired; Seven always seems to know what’s going to work. There was forced porn viewing, assplay, pain, and humiliation. He jerked me around with his belt around my neck. He would alternate rewards with punishments. At one point I had to pee, and I almost believed he wouldn’t let me, or would make me use a bucket. (Side note: getting up to go to the bathroom with your hands and ankles still duct taped together is an exercise on flexibility and confidence-building.)
A proposition from Twitter that I find very plausible:
No matter how good your sub is at oral sex, a shock collar makes them that much better. Sweatier and more nervous, but better.
— Douglas Kent (@DouglasKent23) September 1, 2012
I’ve actually got one of those training shock collars for dogs, but it turns out that it’s a hard limit for The Not-So-Lucky Girl, so we probably won’t be trying this.
Say what you will about That Book (and I can’t say much because I most of my BDSM fiction for free from places like Kristen’s Archive) but if it’s inspired Cosmo to try printing BDSM sex tips, the book really may have changed the world. And, word comes, it has indeed so inspired the sexual trend-setters at Cosmo. The BDSM tips are very basic, but I confess I don’t understand why they inspire so much snark in the linked article. For instance:
4. “Press a fork (firmly, but don’t break the skin or anything) into different parts of his body — his butt cheeks, his pecs, his thighs.”
Sensation play, with common cheap household object, because not everybody has a gleaming Wartenberg wheel in a fancy sheath. (Nor yet even the plastic disposable version.) Baby steps. But do they really deserve this sort of snarky commentary?
This was clearly written at lunchtime, after a morning spent rummaging around the office for kinkspiration. Rejected options: “Hold a blueberry muffin in your fist and punch him in the mouth.” “Pretend to be a naughty piece of printer paper and tell him to ‘staple’ you.” “Act like a PDF and order him to ‘fax me hard.’ Make all relevant noises.”
Incidentally, if the women who read Cosmo need to be cautioned against stabbing someone with a fork hard enough to break the skin, then their partners are going to need more than a safe word.
I shouldn’t think basic safety advice for a kinky-novice audience is out of place. Especially when it’s intended to be reassuring; the message is “you don’t need to make bloody holes to be doing BDSM” which is aimed at a BDSM misconception that’s genuinely out there. It’s not “you’re so stupid you might accidentally pierce your fella with a fork.”
Elsewhere on Bondage Blog:
From a no-longer-there website called Dungeon 21.
Elsewhere on Bondage Blog:
This is the best explanation of BDSM you will ever see. Somebody asked “Explain to me the technicalities of BDSM” and Erinkyan replied:
Well you see you start out with two teams of 11 people, one is the “doms” and one is the “subs”. There is a referee called “the switch”.
Then the game starts when the subs give a wrapped gift called “submission” to the doms, and the doms have to laugh like supervillains and crack whips. Then the two teams jelly wrestle for half an hour, with points being awarded for lost items of clothing.
After the jelly wrestling there is an obstacle course called “THE ONE TRUE WAY” and during it if a dom answers to anything but MASTER they are disqualified and if a sub refuses any order given them they are also disqualified and sent to the sin bin (where the orgies happen).
Then they play the most hardcore game of Simon Says you’ve ever seen.
Then at the end of the game whichever team has the most points is the winner of BDSM and the captain of that team becomes the King of Alternative Sexuality.
The dominants always win because true submissives always give in to dominants.
In my experience the most fun is always to be had in the sin bin.
