Ass Up! For Phoenix Marie

At the newish Sexually Broken website they call this position a “bondage pile driver” pose:

phoenex marie bondage

It’s not shown here, but the lovely-and-flexible Phoenix Marie does indeed get “pile driven” most impressively by director Matt Williams while she’s in the position for it. I know that first picture is nothing but legs and boobs and rope, but it’s really her. Here’s a better shot where you can see her face after it comes untucked from between her knees as a consequence of some of that vigorous pile-driving.

pheonix marie in bondage

This is from yesterday’s (12/17) update at Sexually Broken, so there aren’t any free galleries yet. You can take my word, though, that we’re seeing only the third (of three) “fuck me in bondage” poses Phoenix spends a lot of time in during the shoot. She also gets tied wrists-and-ankles to that iron bed frame with her legs up and gets fucked that way, as well as flopped over face down at the edge of the mattress for a difficult-angle head-back deep throating. At Sexually Broken, the bondage (though strict) is primarily an enabler for the rough bondage sex — and isn’t that a big part of why we all like it so much?

Here we can see in her face that the strain of that position is starting to get to her:

phonix marie bondage

Cameraman, can we close up a bit, please?

phenix marie bondage

Naturally enough we can’t let the poor girl get bored, so Matt Williams, who has already deep-dicked her three different times and is, after all, only human, breaks out the big heavy vibrator to force another few orgasms out of her:

pheenix marie in bondage suffering Hitachi Magic Wand forced orgasm

He’s merciless and takes his time, so this is when we fade out, to the sounds of her helpless muffled screams of ecstasy…

Elsewhere on Bondage Blog:

Rain DeGrey’s Kinky Formative Influences

It turns out, Rain DeGrey credits the Nancy Drew books, in Nancy Drew Made Me Kinky:

I *loved* the Nancy Drew series. I read every one of the books I could get my little hands on, and was continually raiding the local library for fresh material. Eventually my mother noticed I was plowing going through 3 or more of them in a single day. “Rain, I had no idea you were such a fast reader!” she would exclaim proudly…

I didn’t have the heart to tell her that I was only reading the good part in each book before casting it aside. I would flip open to the table of contents, locate the chapter where Nancy Drew gets kidnapped and tied up and eagerly read that chapter before moving on to the next book. Of course I was easily getting through 3 of them daily.

Nancy Drew seemed to have a hankering for rough trade. That nubile 16 year old girl spent a fair amount of her time getting repeatedly captured, kidnapped, tied up, chloroformed and choked out. This happened in almost every book and I would linger over the chapter…

Elsewhere on Bondage Blog:

(Chained) Virgins For The Cardinal

In the best anti-clerical porn tradition, I offer this vintage strokebook cover:

chained virgin being ravished by a cardinal who is still wearing the mitre fancy hat

Elsewhere on Bondage Blog:

Pretty Blue Tape Gag

Something’s got this girl’s full attention and is making her wild-eyed over her pretty blue tape gag:

wild-eyed over a well-taped mouth

I wonder what it could be?

Oh, maybe it’s this huge leather flogger?

breast whipping for a gagged girl

Pictures are from Long Dozen.

Kali’s Teeth

I found this image of a Kali’s Teeth “chastity device” (you might call it an erection-preventer, or at least an erection-punisher) on a French tumblr:

kali\'s teeth femdom chastity device

Elsewhere on Bondage Blog:

Submissives Without Capitalization

It is time for a small grammar rant that has building within me for most of ten years now.

There are many many many blogs out there written in the voice of submissive persons who wish to emphasize their submissive status (or even their notional dehumanized, objectified status as a slave or a pet or a piece of furniture) in their prose. It’s an understandable impulse, and since English rules of grammar don’t have a lot of status signifiers built in, the human language response (inevitably) is to invent some.

So far, so good. That’s what we monkeys do when you give us a language. We evolve it to fit our needs of the day. Gives prescriptivists fits, but oh well, they can suck it.

How do we see this expressed in submissive writing? Well, in lots of ways; but the subject of today’s rant is the use of non-standard capitalization. A submissive or slave will often refer to a dominant by a title like “Master” or “Mistress”; and these will be capitalized just as we have long capitalized references to deities and royalty, to emphasize their exalted status relative to the speaker. The related personal and possessive pronouns will then usually be capitalized as well, for consistency and emphasis. Thus: “After breakfast my Master ordered me to fellate Him and then to lick His boots.”

We’re still solidly on the well-traveled road of language speakers evolving their usages to fit their present needs. Awesome. If a non-standard usage is not only clear, but actually does a better job of transmitting the speaker’s intent than standard usages would do, I have no beef. Again, prescriptivists will squawk, and may suck et cetera.

The road begins to get a little more bumpy when the submissive person decides that if Master is such a lordly fellow that His references need to all be capitalized, then little insignificant subbie shouldn’t put on airs by capitalizing self-references. Thus: “After breakfast i sucked Master’s dick and He said i was a good girl.” Unfortunately converting that usually-capitalized “I” to lower case is just about the only tool the submissive can find in this toolbox, since most self-references in the English language aren’t capitalized. Except — and here’s where the bumpy road goes off the cliff — at the beginning of sentences.

Having found a tool for expressing self-minimization in print, the typical enthusiastic submissive then insists on using that tool rigorously and without exception. Thus: “i sucked Master’s dick and He told me He loves me.” “my Master loves me.”

And this is a problem. Now, readability begins to suffer. Because the OTHER purpose of capital letters is to indicate the beginning of a sentence. It is a primarily typographic function intended to smooth the reading of large blocks of prose. And it is an important function. If you don’t believe me, try and read 35 paragraphs of chatter about “i did this on my webcam” and “my wishlist is on Amazon and i want lots of stuff” and “i wonder if Master really is going to leave His wife the way He promises”. It doesn’t read so badly in-line in my long set of string quotes, but break it up into long paragraphs on a blog and it rapidly becomes wearying. Mix it with non-standard punctuation (a favorite is lots of elipses standing in for periods, dashes, and semicolons all three) and it can make the narrative very hard to follow indeed.

Understand that I’m not purely doing an “old man shouts at clouds” routine here. This is a practical problem for anybody who blogs or types anything anywhere on the internet, because when we do that, we tend to quote each other. And when we quote, it’s normal courtesy to clean up a few simple and obvious errors in the quoted matter, to make each other look good.

But what’s routine becomes rude, I submit, if we are “correcting” deliberate stylistic choices. One typically ought not do that.

So, when it comes to capitalized Masters and “He spanks me, i lurves Him” submissives, we need to leave them alone. But when it comes to an “i” or a “me” or a “my” at the beginning of a sentence:

i won’t do that. my eyes can’t take it. i would go blind. me and my whole clan cannot afford the eye surgery i would need. my eyeballs would wither and then subsequently explode. my heavens, no! i won’t do that.

Hell, Meatloaf wouldn’t do that.

Nope nope nope:

I won’t do that.

So now when I quote submissives, I try to preserve all of their non-standard capitalizations within the sentences, but I sometimes promote their “i” to “I” and their “my” to “My” whenever one of these has to carry the freight of signalling that a sentence is beginning. I think it’s a reasonable compromise that they, themselves, ought to be implementing. “No, Master, i am not repudiating my submission when i capitalize the pronoun for Your pet at the beginning of a sentence. I’m just helping demonstrating that Your girl cares about making these stories easier to read! My heart and my body belong to You, but i understand that typographical conventions are important to clarity!”

Branded And Tit-Whipped

A recent scan-from-paper bit of dungeon porn at Spanking Blog, artist unknown but possibly Eric Stanton:

dungeon tit-whipping and branding

Elsewhere on Bondage Blog: