<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Hanging Cherry	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.bondageblog.com/2012/01/18/hanging-cherry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.bondageblog.com/2012/01/18/hanging-cherry/</link>
	<description>Taking Pleasure In The Beauty Of Restrained Women</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2020 07:52:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rope Guy		</title>
		<link>https://www.bondageblog.com/2012/01/18/hanging-cherry/#comment-19938</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rope Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 00:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bondageblog.com/?p=5337#comment-19938</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes, Pat, but &lt;b&gt;how many times&lt;/b&gt; does that warning have to appear?  Ultimately it&#039;s an editorial balance.  That information has appeared on this blog before, but I don&#039;t believe it&#039;s my editorial obligation to plaster safety information on every post that features potentially dangerous play (essentially, all of them).  What&#039;s more, I think it&#039;s rightfully &lt;b&gt;my&lt;/b&gt; editorial decision to make, and I get just a little prickly when commenters come along and say (or strongly imply) that they disagree with my editorial decisions, and then try to provide the safety warnings that I chose (for whatever reasons) not to provide or repeat in connection with a given post.

The line I tend to draw is that I allow, but do not particularly appreciate, the provision of safety information in comments, if the info strikes me as accurate and non-judgmental.  Under this standard, Pat, your first comment was fine.  Les crossed the line by providing &lt;b&gt;wrong&lt;/b&gt; info in a way that struck me as both judgmental and condescending.  A couple of subsequent commenters (both first-timers) didn&#039;t make the cut, with explicitly judgmental comments asserting that this sort of play was too dangerous for anybody -- essentially, attempting to impose their safety opinions on the rest of us.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Pat, but <b>how many times</b> does that warning have to appear?  Ultimately it&#8217;s an editorial balance.  That information has appeared on this blog before, but I don&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s my editorial obligation to plaster safety information on every post that features potentially dangerous play (essentially, all of them).  What&#8217;s more, I think it&#8217;s rightfully <b>my</b> editorial decision to make, and I get just a little prickly when commenters come along and say (or strongly imply) that they disagree with my editorial decisions, and then try to provide the safety warnings that I chose (for whatever reasons) not to provide or repeat in connection with a given post.</p>
<p>The line I tend to draw is that I allow, but do not particularly appreciate, the provision of safety information in comments, if the info strikes me as accurate and non-judgmental.  Under this standard, Pat, your first comment was fine.  Les crossed the line by providing <b>wrong</b> info in a way that struck me as both judgmental and condescending.  A couple of subsequent commenters (both first-timers) didn&#8217;t make the cut, with explicitly judgmental comments asserting that this sort of play was too dangerous for anybody &#8212; essentially, attempting to impose their safety opinions on the rest of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Pat Powers		</title>
		<link>https://www.bondageblog.com/2012/01/18/hanging-cherry/#comment-19937</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat Powers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bondageblog.com/?p=5337#comment-19937</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not arguing she has no right to do noose play if she wants to, but I think it&#039;s well to warn that the problem is not just ashphyxiation, but neck injury as well. Cherry wants to do noose play, it&#039;s her call. But I remember when I used to hang at the forums at Kristine Imboch&#039;s Bondage University, we&#039;d occasionally have to caution newbies about noose play and also some of them would ask questions like, &quot;Where can I get some chloroform so I can knock out my cutie/be knocked out by my dom?&quot; and we&#039;d all be going, &quot;Chloroform bad! Kidneys go boom!&quot; Or something to that effect. You never know who&#039;s reading your blog, or how much they know or don&#039;t know.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not arguing she has no right to do noose play if she wants to, but I think it&#8217;s well to warn that the problem is not just ashphyxiation, but neck injury as well. Cherry wants to do noose play, it&#8217;s her call. But I remember when I used to hang at the forums at Kristine Imboch&#8217;s Bondage University, we&#8217;d occasionally have to caution newbies about noose play and also some of them would ask questions like, &#8220;Where can I get some chloroform so I can knock out my cutie/be knocked out by my dom?&#8221; and we&#8217;d all be going, &#8220;Chloroform bad! Kidneys go boom!&#8221; Or something to that effect. You never know who&#8217;s reading your blog, or how much they know or don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rope Guy		</title>
		<link>https://www.bondageblog.com/2012/01/18/hanging-cherry/#comment-19929</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rope Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 22:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bondageblog.com/?p=5337#comment-19929</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As explained in the link I provided to Pat, risk assessment is individual and personal.  If you&#039;re attempting to comment on Bondage Blog to argue that a given activity is &quot;too risky&quot; or &quot;not too risky&quot; for people other than yourself, you&#039;re probably discovering the joy that is blog comment moderation right about now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As explained in the link I provided to Pat, risk assessment is individual and personal.  If you&#8217;re attempting to comment on Bondage Blog to argue that a given activity is &#8220;too risky&#8221; or &#8220;not too risky&#8221; for people other than yourself, you&#8217;re probably discovering the joy that is blog comment moderation right about now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rope Guy		</title>
		<link>https://www.bondageblog.com/2012/01/18/hanging-cherry/#comment-19925</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rope Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 05:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bondageblog.com/?p=5337#comment-19925</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I kind of liked her as a brunette, but you know, different strokes and all that.  ;-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kind of liked her as a brunette, but you know, different strokes and all that.  ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John		</title>
		<link>https://www.bondageblog.com/2012/01/18/hanging-cherry/#comment-19924</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 02:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bondageblog.com/?p=5337#comment-19924</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Cherry Torn is amazing...though she looked better with the pink hair.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cherry Torn is amazing&#8230;though she looked better with the pink hair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rope Guy		</title>
		<link>https://www.bondageblog.com/2012/01/18/hanging-cherry/#comment-19923</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rope Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bondageblog.com/?p=5337#comment-19923</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Pat, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bondageblog.com/2008/12/23/pretty-piglet-in-the-dark/#comment-12483&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;duh&lt;/a&gt;?

Les, you&#039;re wrong.  A noose can be simply &quot;a loop in the end of a rope or cord&quot; -- look it up.  

It would be correct to say this is not a &lt;i&gt;hangman&#039;s noose&lt;/i&gt; -- which has the characteristic you describe.  But, of course, nobody said different.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat, <a href="http://www.bondageblog.com/2008/12/23/pretty-piglet-in-the-dark/#comment-12483" rel="nofollow">duh</a>?</p>
<p>Les, you&#8217;re wrong.  A noose can be simply &#8220;a loop in the end of a rope or cord&#8221; &#8212; look it up.  </p>
<p>It would be correct to say this is not a <i>hangman&#8217;s noose</i> &#8212; which has the characteristic you describe.  But, of course, nobody said different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: les		</title>
		<link>https://www.bondageblog.com/2012/01/18/hanging-cherry/#comment-19922</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[les]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 20:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bondageblog.com/?p=5337#comment-19922</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[And, thank goodness, that&#039;s not a noose.

Once a noose is put under tension, it snugs up and almost becomes a 1 way knot.  Play around with one some time.  Nooses REALLY don&#039;t want to let go.

I don&#039;t like the neck thing to begin with, but that would take it way too far.  After all, a suffocating submissive likely won&#039;t be able to safeword.  That trembling and kicking WON&#039;T be an orgasm.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, thank goodness, that&#8217;s not a noose.</p>
<p>Once a noose is put under tension, it snugs up and almost becomes a 1 way knot.  Play around with one some time.  Nooses REALLY don&#8217;t want to let go.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like the neck thing to begin with, but that would take it way too far.  After all, a suffocating submissive likely won&#8217;t be able to safeword.  That trembling and kicking WON&#8217;T be an orgasm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
