<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How To Find A Dom	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.bondageblog.com/2011/12/28/how-to-find-a-dom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.bondageblog.com/2011/12/28/how-to-find-a-dom/</link>
	<description>Taking Pleasure In The Beauty Of Restrained Women</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 05:28:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: SapioSlut		</title>
		<link>https://www.bondageblog.com/2011/12/28/how-to-find-a-dom/#comment-19813</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SapioSlut]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 05:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bondageblog.com/?p=5214#comment-19813</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hey Rope_Guy!  Thank you for spreading this essay further. The reason we posted it was because it does give some good guidlines for a newbie subby person to work from. 

As with anything we read on the internet it needs to be read with a common sense filter and applied judiciously to one&#039;s own circumstances.  As I said in my own comment on it I got lucky but I made my luck by applying particular standards around integrity - it was one thing I understood even if I didn&#039;t have such a reference guide. 

While the standard is high, I wouldn’t suggest that one doesn&#039;t dom until one has ‘ticked off’ all of them. My interpretation is that the list was compiled as things to look for, not prerequisites or absolutes. I think the chief concern is to ensure that people exploring new aspects to their sexuality have experiences that help them to blossom, whatever their role.

Wouldn&#039;t it be interesting to see an essay for new(ish) doms, and what to look for in a sub?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Rope_Guy!  Thank you for spreading this essay further. The reason we posted it was because it does give some good guidlines for a newbie subby person to work from. </p>
<p>As with anything we read on the internet it needs to be read with a common sense filter and applied judiciously to one&#8217;s own circumstances.  As I said in my own comment on it I got lucky but I made my luck by applying particular standards around integrity &#8211; it was one thing I understood even if I didn&#8217;t have such a reference guide. </p>
<p>While the standard is high, I wouldn’t suggest that one doesn&#8217;t dom until one has ‘ticked off’ all of them. My interpretation is that the list was compiled as things to look for, not prerequisites or absolutes. I think the chief concern is to ensure that people exploring new aspects to their sexuality have experiences that help them to blossom, whatever their role.</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be interesting to see an essay for new(ish) doms, and what to look for in a sub?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
