Comments on: 16th Century Chastity Belt https://www.bondageblog.com/2008/09/17/16th-century-chastity-belt/ Taking Pleasure In The Beauty Of Restrained Women Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:41:16 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Panda Trainer https://www.bondageblog.com/2008/09/17/16th-century-chastity-belt/#comment-19614 Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:41:16 +0000 http://www.bondageblog.com/2008/09/17/16th-century-chastity-belt/#comment-19614 Overweight or pudgy women of the era were considered the most desirable. It hinted at a luxurious and opulent lifestyle away from the toils of farm life or hard labor. Pale women were more desirable than their well tanned counterparts for the same reason. This is why paintings from that era to the middle 19th century featured mainly portly women. It showed status.

]]> By: Rope Guy https://www.bondageblog.com/2008/09/17/16th-century-chastity-belt/#comment-12033 Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:29:20 +0000 http://www.bondageblog.com/2008/09/17/16th-century-chastity-belt/#comment-12033 Guys, I’m not so convinced the artist was intending to show that the lady is pregnant.

Artistic styles have changed a lot in five hundred years. Most humaniform art from that era looks oddly proportioned to modern eyes. It’s possible that we are seeing a woman with a pot belly, especially given the way her breasts are drawn as squidgy little spheres.

]]> By: Sammy https://www.bondageblog.com/2008/09/17/16th-century-chastity-belt/#comment-12032 Fri, 19 Sep 2008 02:19:54 +0000 http://www.bondageblog.com/2008/09/17/16th-century-chastity-belt/#comment-12032 I’d hate to see her go into labor with the key unavailable…

]]> By: J.W. Throat https://www.bondageblog.com/2008/09/17/16th-century-chastity-belt/#comment-12028 Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:58:27 +0000 http://www.bondageblog.com/2008/09/17/16th-century-chastity-belt/#comment-12028 Looking at her tummy, it is a bit late for a chastity belt – she is already pregnant!

]]>