This hentai artwork (based, I think, on characters from Ragnarok Online) comes from alt. binaries. pictures. erotica. cartoons, but I’m sharing it with you because I love the voluptuously adult bodies of these gagged anime women:
See Also:
I would like to know more about the mysterious H.W. who drew these brutal-but-cartoony bondage and whipping illustrations:
Google has largely failed me; one site claims they are the work of H.W. Hannau, a mid-20th-century photographer famous for postcard illustrations, including a series of Betty Page as beach bunny. But can I find any other drawings — BDSM or otherwise — by H.W. Hannau? I cannot.
Links or info would be most welcome in the comments.
It’s been quite a little while since I last showed you some of the plain old-fashioned rope bondage hogties that first made Hogtied.com so famous, most of a decade ago. I fix it now! Here’s your recommended daily allowance of roots bondage, three views of a thoroughly-hogtied Madison Young:
From this photoshoot. (Sample pictures and video.)
See Also:
I thought y’all might enjoy this “bondage enema” series of panels from an unidentifed Japanese manga I found on alt. binaries. pictures. erotica. anime:
See Also:
Back in early September when I first posted happily about Kink.com’s new public bondage site, I speculated (wrongly) that Public Disgrace was being shot in San Francisco. Although some shoots are indeed being done there, it turns out that most shooting will be done in more permissive European cities. On September 24, The SF Bay Guardian reported (as part of a larger piece about Kink.com) the following:
WiredPussy.com creator Princess Donna is launching her new pet product, PublicDisgrace.com, next month. The site will feature blatant public bondage, punishment, erotic humiliation, and explicit sex between models and, potentially, passersby.
The veteran domme is filming most scenes in Europe, where attitudes (and therefore laws) about sex are more lax. In fact, while shooting a scene on a public street in Berlin, the crew was stopped by a couple of motorcycle cops who said only, “If you cause an accident, you’ll be liable,” before going on their way. In the shoot, a half-naked girl is tied to a park bench, made to carry a dog bowl while on a leash, fondled by her female master, and fucked by a man.
“It’s the adrenaline rush of potentially getting caught,” says Acworth, explaining the site’s appeal and recipe for success.
In the comments on this Bondage Blog post and at many other places, people have been wondering how they get away with the public filming, and how they avoid offending innocent bystanders. Peter Acworth, the creative genius and head honcho at Kink.com, has responded to some of those questions in several places, but the most concise compilation is probably here:
The most important point is that we have crews of people on walkie-talkies who are on the constant lookout for minors. The site is shot in such a way that nudity can be covered very quickly.
You will notice that any extreme activity, such as penetrative sex, always happens in relative seclusion so that the crew has the time to stop the activity if necessary. Activities that take place in a situation which is impossible to completely control (such as in front of moving traffic or a boat on a river) either happen at a very long distance, or the activity is toned down and will include less nudity.
Some scenes look impossible to control and people do seem concerned with how we are shooting this, but the fact is that they are not in a position to be able to tell which of the participants are actual bystanders and which are paid extras. For obvious reasons, I don’t want to go into details here. However, please let me reassure you that all individuals who exchange fluids have been tested and our producer has gathered paperwork which verifies the age of all performers.
More generally, if we were offending people, this site would be impossible to shoot. The fact is that we make many people’s day, and complaints are very rare indeed. Many people are curious to see the play in an obviously consensual context (i.e. in front of a video crew), and this results in dialog and a lot of interest and joy from those who choose to watch. I.e. there are also positive repercussions from our activities.
This site would indeed be impossible to shoot without causing offense in most parts of the US, and this is just because of the American view of sex in general. However, please let me reiterate how different life is in the areas of continental Europe we are shooting. For instance, virtually all beaches in continental Europe embrace nudity to some extent or another (in full view of minors); nudity, and in some cases actual pornography, plays on public TV stations during daylight hours in many countries.
The city our producer is next planning on shooting has only one law on the subject: “no lewd act in front of a minor” and we intend to obey that law. I think its potentially hard for many Americans to imagine it being legal to be nude on any beach, or indeed to have sex in a public place as long as it is shielded from minors.
Lastly, just to help put this in context, people see things they don’t completely consent to all the time. For instance, if you go to 6th street in San Francisco, you can regularly see homeless people shooting up, pissing, or shitting on the sidewalk. Many people (including minors) are habitually exposed to drug use and violence on the streets in some neighborhoods in many American cities. Such is the American gun culture, it is hard to avoid being exposed to violence on American TV or movies, much of which is aimed at an audience which includes minors.
Don’t get me wrong – I am certainly no in favor of censorship! I’m just making the point that different communities find different things offensive. This is not because we’re fundamentally any different, I think its just a question of socialization and conditioning.
Thanks to everyone who expressed concerns about this, and I hope some of the notes in this letter have helped allay some concerns.
Respectfully yours.
Peter Acworth
Founder/CEO, kink.com
From my viewpoint, Peter’s just explaining the obvious. Kink.com picks tolerant jurisdictions, they use scouts to protect the shoot and control the level and extent of public interaction, and they sometimes use extras to create the illusion that the barrier between the shoot and “the public” is leakier than it actually is. Obviously the illusion is a runaway success, if people are concerned about the lack of a barrier!
I am not, ultimately, moved by the argument that there’s a visual consent issue. Some folks are worried that “people shouldn’t have to see” the nudity and bondage that actually does get exposed to public view, and that the bystanders “haven’t consented” to seeing this. I think talking about consent with respect to visual stimulus is very nearly nonsense, even in the abstract; in most cases, it’s possible to avert one’s eyes and go on about one’s business.
And that’s in the abstract. In the specific context of our advertising-driven commercial world, most of the global economy is structured around intrusive, even abusive, non-consensual visual stimulus in the form of advertising. It’s taken for granted that there’s no need to obtain consent from any of us before we are bombarded, for every minute of our waking day, with powerful visual messages, right there in the street, from every billboard and bus stop wall. If the notion of consent had any meaning in the context of what we are “allowed” to see, we’d live in a very different world. But it doesn’t. As a society, as a commercial culture, we have conclusively determined that we don’t need consent from people before exposing them to things they might prefer not to see in public.
This looks to me like somebody was shooting in a European dungeon and they decided to start playing with the tools of the Inquisition that were still hanging on the walls:
The picture is from Bizarre #20.
Have you ever been doing some anal exploration and wished you had a second pair of hands, so you could hold her (or his, I suppose, no need to be unduly heterosexist) butt cheeks apart while keeping your hands free? Sure, you can make her do it, in some positions; but sometimes she needs those hands to balance, or they happen to be in handcuffs, or whatever.
There’s a much much simpler solution for exposing her rosebud to fresh air, sunshine, squirts of lube, and your penis: duct tape.
Thanks to My Submissive Heart for publishing the graphic illustrative photograph.
See Also:
When I saw Mya Nichole squatting over a bucket:
And then I saw this:
I assumed we were looking at yet another dungeon watersports scene. I thought the carpeted floor was a nice touch — extra punishments for missing the bucket? — but otherwise, it’s ho hum for me; not being wired for that particular fetish, I can appreciate some of the humiliation aspects but it’s not fundamentally my thing.
The gallery text, though, puts a novel spin on the images: “It turns out Mya is a prodigious squirter, so TJ makes her cum in a bucket….”
From Fucked And Bound. (There’s also video.)
See Also:
When I saw Big Peg on ErosBlog: The Sex Blog, I realized I have some bondage art that’s similar-looking (possibly by the same artist, certainly it all has an anal theme in common) in my “need to blog this” folder. There are a couple of bondage enema pictures (to be blogged later) and this bit of vigorous rectal invasiveness:
See Also:
It sounds like the producers of Dexter need — and I’ll betcha they very suddenly developed — better safety procedures for filming bondage scenes. Here’s the story from the Daily Star:
A TV stuntman is lucky to be alive after actor Jimmy Smits stabbed him for real during a fight scene for TV show Dexter.
Smits grabbed a real knife instead of a prop knife during shooting and plunged it into action man Jeff Chase.
Chase was only saved by a piece of plastic placed over his heart - which Smits miraculously hit.
He says, “For the scene, I was bound in Saran Wrap, duct tape over my mouth. I couldn’t say a thing as I saw Jimmy grab at the knife. He picked up the real one by pure mistake. It was a mean looking knife.
“I heard fellow actor Michael C. Hall yelling at Jimmy to stop - but it was too late. I felt the thud in my chest. I didn’t have on a metal breast plate like a lot of actors do in a scene like that.
“Instead I had a piece of acrylic clear plastic about the size of a Post-it note over my heart. It was a quarter of an inch thick. In eight out of 10 takes with the prop knife, Jimmy had missed the plastic. But by a miracle, an act of God, the knife landed at the very edge of the plastic.
“I really thought I’d been stabbed in the heart, but I didn’t have a scratch. Jimmy was devastated and couldn’t stop apologising. I told him, I felt more sorry for him than me.”
First of all, the stuntman didn’t have a safety signal / safeword? A handful of marbles? Nothing?
To be fair, it does sound like things happened very fast. Which is the other point. Who the heck approved laying the “live” knife right beside the prop knife so that it was even possible for Smits to grab the wrong one? You issue that thing to a production assistant (aka “flunky”) with strict instructions to keep it safely out of the way until whatever scene it’s needed for, to be handed over only when the person directing the shoot so orders.
A few weeks ago, in the Bondage Blog post Public Bondage, Public Disgrace, I waxed enthusiastic about the new Public Disgrace site from Kink.com. Well, the new site went live today, and it’s every bit as delicious as I had hoped. Here’s a gallery featuring the lovely Valentina Blue. First she livens up a construction site, in handcuffs and a ball gag:
Then she’s forced to squat and piddle in some bushes, just feet from the street, with handcuffs on:
And last, she’s dragged into an ally for some semi-public spanking, followed by a rough bondage blowjob:
See Also:
Here’s some medieval bondage from a movie called The Seventh Seal:
With her feet in the stocks and her wrists chained over her head, she’s not going anywhere!
In 1805, when Lewis And Clark left the upper Missouri country en route to the Columbia River valley, they took with them a slave woman, the “wife” of a French voyageur named Touissant Charbonneau, who had originally purchased her from the Hidatsa Indians. You’ve heard of this slave wife; her name was Sacajawea.
Ultimately Sacajawea proved very useful to the expedition, helping it secure horses from her original people, the Shoshone. But in a different universe, only slightly different, Lewis and Clark would have had their own slave wives, and maybe they didn’t ever get the horses they needed. So they would have had to put the women to work, fitting them with bits and harnesses and stout shoes and decorative horse-tail butt plugs. In that universe, all the dramatic etchings and statues of “Lewis and Clark Surveying the Headwaters of the Columbia” would have been overshadowed by the nineteenth-century equivalents of this photograph:
Picture credit: The Training Of O, specifically this gallery.
See Also:
