Bondage In Stockings

There was a time when the folks who made bondage porn were so worried about going to jail, that they bent over backwards to make it as wholesome and unthreatening (to obscenity juries) as they possibly could. This often included eschewing nudity, so they compensated by using the prettiest lingerie they could manage, lacy stuff with garter belts and stockings and things no man who is not an underwear fetishist could hope to name.

You don’t see as much of that sort of thing as you used to, but the retro “bound in lingerie” sensibility still turns up quite a lot on fetish-fashion models. One such is Emily Marilyn, and this gallery makes much of her lingerie:

lingerie bondage

silk or nylon stockings bondage

  • post on your Tumblr blog

7 comments on “Bondage In Stockings”:

Maddouc commented on September 29th, 2008 at 12:39 pm:

I knopw I’m going to take a bashing for saying this, but the name is a little “Tranny” ish. There’s no indication on her website that she actually is a she.

Mia commented on September 29th, 2008 at 12:47 pm:

That garter belt/bra combo is to die for. I’m a mega lingerie fan–especially when it’s white lace. My husband loves the soft pretty sweet-girl look, which is a nice contrast to the red on my bottom I frequently wear :)

Rope Guy commented on September 29th, 2008 at 12:48 pm:

Maddouc, and you care why?

Maddouc commented on September 30th, 2008 at 2:37 pm:

Haha – good one!!

Rope Guy commented on October 1st, 2008 at 1:04 am:

Huh? It wasn’t a joke.

I think you’re nuts, to be honest; this is a woman, as you can tell from the photos.

But, for the sake of argument, if you’re right and she’s a very convincing M-to-F transsexual, why would you care? We’re looking at pictures, not negotiating a tryst. And if the pictures are good enough to be convincing, what more do you want?

I’m not bashing, I’m just asking, because your comments have left me baffled.

Maddouc commented on October 1st, 2008 at 11:30 am:

Well, I did some research and yes, of course, she’s a she.
And, being able to tell from photos that a woman is a woman is definitely a skill, because there sure are some feminine men out there; but to answer your question, as a straight male, I couldn’t look at a picture, for sexual tittilation, thinking it was a man.
Fair enough?

Rope Guy commented on October 1st, 2008 at 1:58 pm:

Oh, I see.

Sure, it’s fairly easy to be fooled, and nobody enjoys that. I get that part, even though I was pretty confident in this case.

But your original comment didn’t say the pictures looked like a man to you, so I didn’t realized you were “thinking it was a man” — all you said was that the name made you suspicious.

That’s the part that baffled me — if she looks like a woman, and you agree she looks like a woman, why be “thinking it was a man” in the first place, rather than just looking and enjoying?

Visual cues being “off” could certainly spoil my enjoyment of uncertain photos; but if the visual cues are right, I still don’t get where the worry comes from.

It sounds to me — and maybe you’ll take this as the bashing you were worried about, though I don’t mean it this way — like your level of concern about being fooled (titillated by someone who turns out not to be female) is turned up very high. At this level of remoteness (looking at pictures over the internet) it’s not a huge deal if it happens; I’m inclined to trust my eyes and shrug when their discernment fails me. Doing “research” before trusting what my eyes tell me sounds like a lot of effort, and for what?

Bacchus at ErosBlog has written about what he calls the “It’s a tranny!” gotcha game. You’re coming across as someone who has “lost” that game in the past or who is very determined never to lose it. I, on the other hand, don’t really “get” why the game is so important.

Make a comment:

*